Psychopharmocology

Thursday, April 27, 2006

Paper is done

Just finished up the final paper so i figured i would write a journal entry describing how i felt about this whole independent study:

Well first off it seems like the end of the semester is so far away but in reality it just sneeks up on you so fast. I found it very interesting to learn about something that i knew little about. Since i want to get into pharmacy i have a foundation on where i might be able to work from for further research papers and things. It also relates on a personal level because psychiatrists are having a hard time trying to figure out what to prescribe my brother for drugs because of his car addicent.

They don't wanna prescribe something that could potentially damage him and by doing this reasearch project i have a better understand of where they are coming from. Overall i do feel that this has bettered my knowledge of the subject and like i mentioned provides a good groundwork for graduate school. Who knows maybe it could lead to me doing my own research on this topic.

Monday, April 24, 2006

Final Paper

well, we're getting down to the end of it now. So i'm almost finished with my final paper, i turned in a rough draft last week so we shall see how that turns out. so far my paper looks like this: Psychopharmacology is the use of psychological drugs to treat disorders of the mind. There are many issues concerning psychopharmacology. The most talked about concerns are ethics. Prescribing these drugs to adults has been around for a few years now. However, the prescribing of these psychotropic drugs to children has been on the rise. Many questions arise such as, is it ethical to be prescribing chemistry altering drugs to our youth at ages such as three or four years of age? Many argue yes and many argue no. By using such medications as stimulants, depressants and anti-depressants we may be causing more damage than we think or we may be bettering children overall. This paper serves to offer a two sided approach to the issue at hand to hopefully provide the reader with clear information to weigh both sides of the argument. Should children in preschool or middle school be prescribed these drugs that could or could not cause long term damage to their brain chemistry or structures? It will also serve to provide some background on who is suggesting or prescribing these drugs and who should really be kept in charge of prescribing these drugs.
As a nation we are finding that our children are becoming depressed at a young age as well and young males are more at risk for suicide. Cummings Wiggins (2001) state that, “Antidepressant medication has become the most popular treatment for depression, and antidepressants have become among the most prescribed psychotropic drugs in America” (122). This may correspond with that since SSRI’s are effective on the treatment of depression then it is easier to prescribe a pill to treat it. This may also mean that the doctor has complete faith in something that he may know little about.
One might think “oh I would never give my child amphetamines or speed”, but needless to say primary care doctors are prescribing Ritalin, Aderol and other types of stimulant drugs to children who are just learning how to read and write. You might wonder why this would happen. The simple fact is, adults want their children to act more like adults and less like children. Play is essential in the development in children. By taking this away from them it could severely impact their development. Parents are not the ones taking all the blame either. Teachers and primary care doctors should be held responsible as well.
Teachers should take responsibility for monitoring the kids closely. They should act like mature adults when dealing with situations concerning whether or not a child should be placed on psychotropic drugs. The teacher’s job is to enhance development of a child’s brain. By suggesting a child is placed on chemistry altering drugs you run the chance of damaging that young brain by over stimulating it. Studies involving rodents suggest that when a young rat is given these stimulants the brain is over exerted and stimulus that should be interesting to a rat is shrugged off almost like an every day occurrence. Evidence for this in humans is starting to emerge but simply put the studies on this are very young and will be interesting to see the data ten years down the road.
As for primary care doctors, they tend to under medicate a child. Meaning that since a primary care doctor’s job is basically over all well being of a patient they are not too focused on what is going on mentally. Primary care doctors only give patients about ten minutes of their time. Think about that, only ten minutes to hear the symptoms and make a quick diagnosis and send you one your way with a prescription. Does that sound very accurate to you for something that could potentially damage a child’s brain for the rest of their lives? Another problem with primary care doctors prescribing these drugs is that there are seldom follow up consultations hence why the drugs are under medicated. Today’s society believes that medicine is the cure to every problem. By having doctors prescribe you one month worth of drugs it might alleviate the symptoms for that month but as soon as they are done then the symptoms return and we get what is known as a rebound effect.
Studies have begun to report a rise in the prescribing of these psychotropic drugs. “Surveys of Medicaid and insurance company databases, however, suggest increased use of psychotropic drugs in pediatric populations. (Brown, Simmons, 2002) Meaning that primary care doctors are prescribing these drugs to children at alarming rates and it is continually increasing.
The job of prescribing these psychotropic drugs should fall upon, practiced and licensed psychiatrists. These individuals are trained specifically in these substances that they are prescribing to our youth. They know the side effects and the durations that children should be kept on. Psychiatrists also factor in the weights and dosages that doctors might not take the time to do. These drugs are made specifically for adults sometimes and by placing a young child on these they often forget that they might need to adjust the dosage on someone so young and small.

So i def need to start working on it some more because its due at the end of this week, so i feel i need to discuss more of the ethical issues that are made here. so my goal is to do this tomorrow on 4-25-06 and have it completley done and to turn it in on thursday.

Wednesday, April 05, 2006

presentation

I did my power point presentation last week and it seemed to go ove well. I really put alot of work into it and now i have to start coming up with the paper. So far i have a few paragraphs written about it and i have a rough draft due on 4-6-06 so i hope to have at least 4 pages completed by then but i am off to a good start because of all the sources that i have for it so doing this research paper should be no problem its just keeping up with the live log that is the problem :-P oh well i am making an effort to stay on top of things. The thing that is really killing me is the paper for the high altitude seminar trying to get all my sources together for that i have such a broad topic that it is kind of hard to find out what i can write on. Hopefully i'll be able to come up with something meaningful for both classes.

Thats all for now will write some more later on

Wednesday, March 22, 2006

Presentation

after working on the power point for a couple of days i feel that i can adequetly give a short and brief description on the use of psychotropic drugs in young children. So on 3-23-06 i will do a short 5 min presentation to Dr. Jennings. So far my findings have been very interesting and i am really into reading about this topic. I will post responses to articles tomorrow.

Thursday, February 23, 2006

Responses to two

Hidden truths : the policy of brain, mind and soul in Australian psychology

In this article it discusses the effects of ADHD on children and the secrets behind the increase in rise of diagnoses of ADHD children. The article basically says that a school that has a child diagnosed with ADHD receives a portion of money from the government. Obviously looking at this from an American point of view it makes me think of what if that probably happens here. Or if say doctors or drug companies get kick backs or bonuses for prescribing the drugs. This article is about Australian life. The author then goes on to discuss this psychological revisionism.

This revisionism seems like it kind of falls under a eugenics type of movement, but I did not understand the whole thing. This article was only published about one year ago in 2005 and he said that he was surprised at how ignorant Americans seemed to be about ADHD. Again though I believe it goes back to many ethical issues that you must concern yourself with. Because as I have said before. Boys with be Boys so to speak but you just have to wonder if it’s a case of children just simply being children.

I think that this article presents a very clear point, however it seems to be a bias one. It seems like the author is trying to get everyone on his side and its not really written like a regular psychological paper is usually.


AEDs and psychotropic drugs in children with autism and epilepsy

After learning a lot about autism and aspergers syndrome I have been really starting to find these types of articles interesting. In this article the author is starting to suggest that the use of SSRI’s maybe used in the treatment of autism in order to relieve some of the repetitiveness. I was also unaware of the risk of epilepsy as a result of having autism. I really liked this article because it discusses some of the structures that were affected by this disease such as the amygdala and hippocampus.

The article also discusses some of the AEDs used to treat the autism and seizures. Such as vaporic acid which seemed to have an alright effect but the a lot of the data on these drugs is very inconclusive. What I mean by this is that there haven’t really been a lot of case studies or long term studies done to find out the effects. According to Prof Lekowitz Autism was pretty much an unknown disorder until Keene State started doing a lot of research on it. So obviously a lot of studies are still waiting to be done and I would expect someone could make a name for themselves if they found some things that helped out autistic children.

Thursday, February 09, 2006

Responses to three articles

In the first article psychopharmacology for the Clinician it discusses medication used to treat Alzheimer’s disease. This study was a randomized placebo 6 month study. It looked to see the loss of benefit of medication on a patient suffering from this disease. The study shows that after one week after stopping of the drug there would be considerable signs that the drug had stopped working. It was also used to treat dementias as well. The study also looked at switching different type of drugs to see the effects they would have on the people. It showed that there was a significant reaction when drugs were discontinued and replaced with others.

The Second article I read was Pediatric psychopharmacology: a review of new developments and recent research. I found this article to be very interesting and I am interested in pursing this for my research paper. The article discusses many different types of drugs for treating children who suffer from, depression, behavioral disorders and some psychotic disorders. It was very interesting to read about all the medication and how some of the medications have just a placebo type of effect whereas other medications help. Such as the SSRI’s used to treat depression. Obviously this is a fairly new field of study so the article discusses the many draw backs about proving efficacy.

I also found it interesting that a pediatrician is not really advised to prescribe drugs without consulting a psychologist. The article describes a battery of tests that a physician should administer while trying to prescribe drugs to young children. The article also raises several issues concerning if children should be treated with these drugs or if they are more designed for adults. There was also mention of parents not really wanting to medicate their children so young or the issue of a teacher saying they should be medicated and the parents not really wanting to medicate their child.

The last article I read was a review of pharmocokinetics and I did not really understand this study. I understood that they were trying to test out some type of dopamine receptor druge and they used subjects that were considered “normal” or “healthy” and they used subjects who were in need of this drug. They also used double blinds and stroop tests in order to test cognition. But as far as what they were trying to prove I could not understand all the medical jargon so I am going to ask questions about it while I meet with you. Maybe you could help shed some light on the situation. I also had difficulty trying to read all the graphs and tables that they were trying to prove their results. One of the things I did comprehend was that it seemed that lower doses of the drug were ok, but when higher doses of the drug were administered it affected memory loss and they almost had a sedative type of effect. But that was pretty much I got out of that last article.